parameters — --raw
What --raw turns off, and who never needs it
--raw is not a realism switch. It removes an opinion — and whether you want that removed depends entirely on whether you brought an opinion of your own.
--raw is usually explained as "makes images more photorealistic". That is a description of a side effect, and following it leads people to add --raw to prompts it actively hurts.
What it actually does is remove a layer. Midjourney applies its own aesthetic judgement to your prompt — flattering light, pleasing composition, a certain finish. --raw turns much of that down and hands the result back closer to what you literally asked for. Whether that helps depends on one question: did you bring something to put in its place?
- 20of 85 images use --raw
- 8 of 18photorealistic images use it
- 0 of 9architecture images use it
- 0 of 7--niji images use it
Who reaches for it, and who never does
| Category | Images | Using --raw | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Photorealistic | 18 | 8 | 44% |
| Reference | 8 | 3 | 38% |
| Concept Art | 47 | 9 | 19% |
| Architecture | 9 | 0 | none |
| Texture | 3 | 0 | none |
The gradient is the finding. Photographic work uses --raw at more than twice the rate of illustration, and the two categories that never use it are the two where the model's default treatment is not in the way.
Photography: removing the flattery
A photograph is a claim about something that existed. Midjourney's default finish undermines that claim — it makes light too kind, skin too even, composition too arranged. --raw takes that off.





Five of the eight photorealistic images using --raw. All five also run --stylize 50 and a shared style code — the same restrained setup discussed in the stylize guide.
Note what makes that work: those prompts are not bare. They carry a style reference that supplies the look Midjourney is no longer supplying. --raw opened a gap and something filled it.
Architecture: nothing to remove
Not one of the nine architecture images uses --raw. They also carry the shortest descriptions in the collection — an average of 45 characters — and mostly no style code either.
Game concept art of an alien world, exotic vegetation, twin suns in the sky, atmospheric perspective, detailed environment design 


Here Midjourney's default judgement is doing useful work: deciding the light, the weather, where the camera stands. Removing it with --raw would leave a short prompt with nothing to fall back on, and short-prompt-plus-raw is the combination that produces the flat, underwhelming results people blame on the parameter.
The other case: a long, exact brief
The second thing that can fill the gap is words. The longest prompt in the collection — 1,228 characters — uses --raw and no style code at all:

That is the coherent alternative. Either a reference specifies the look or your description does. What does not work is removing the model's opinion and then supplying neither. See the prompt-length guide for how far the other extreme goes.
--raw and --niji do not mix
Seven images here use --niji 6, Midjourney's illustration-tuned model. None of them uses --raw, and that is not a stylistic choice — the niji models do not take the flag.
It is worth knowing because the failure is quiet. Adding --raw to a niji prompt does not error; it just does nothing, and you can spend a while adjusting a parameter that was never being read. More on how the model choice changes what else is available in the model-version guide.
When to add it
- You are making a photograph and the output looks styled rather than taken.
- You already carry a style reference and want it to come through rather than being blended with Midjourney's taste.
- Your prompt is long and specific and the model keeps prettifying past your instructions.
And when not to:
- Your prompt is short and has no reference. Add detail first.
- You are on
--niji. It is ignored. - You are chasing "realism" as such —
--rawremoves styling, which is not the same as adding realism. Describe the camera, the lens, the light instead.